We sat down with writer/director JUSTIN BENSON and co-director AARON MOORHEAD to talk about the relationship between their two leads, how the weirdos of the world are in tune with other dimensions and how the genre current filmmakers are swinging for the fences. The second half of the film delves heavily into spoiler territory, so we encourage you to rent the film (available on AMAZON and other VOD outlets) before reading the whole thing. We marked the spoiler territory for you.
I'm really glad you guys
were able to do this interview today. I had a chance to watch the
film again last night and picked up on a lot of little clues that tie
the story together.
Justin: There's so much
stuff in the movie that does looks like a stylistic decision the
first time but when you watch it a second time you realize they're
indicators as to what's going on.
What was the impetus
behind Resolution? I'd read it came together while filming a beer
commercial together along with your two leads (Peter Cilella and
Vinnie Curran)?
Justin: The three main
things were us working on a low budget beer commercial together.
Vinnie and Pete have this special “old friend” chemistry even
though they're not. The movie was written before that by Aaron and I
to work on together. The other thing was a desire to tell a scary
story and do something that would be conceptually scary and frighten
the audience. I wish I had that experience more when I go to see
films. The other thing is where I grew up no one I knew went out to a
cabin in the woods for Spring Break to drink beer and party with
girls. Where I grew up, outside San Diego, is for purpose what Aaron?
Aaron: That would be to
shoot guns, do drugs and avoid paying your taxes. Basically any weird
part of backwoods part of America is that place and that place is
very real. That's not just some cabin area we transformed into a part
of the country that doesn't exist. If you head out there you are
among that very much so.
Did you always have that
area in mind when you developed Resolution or did you adapt it to the
surroundings once you found a location?
Justin: Aaron and I have
about ten years experience each of DIY filmmaking and one of the
things you puck up on is location scouting is one of the biggest
pains in the ass-in production, or when you're there working against
the clock and pissing the owners of the property off-all that stuff.
The script is actually written exactly for those locations to make it
logistically easier. Every single location was written for it
exactly. My family actually owns a lot of the locations in the movie,
strangely enough.
There's a lot of hoarding
and weird shit in those locations. Your family may need an
intervention. One of the best aspects of Resolution is the way you
frame Mike's discoveries. It has a haunted house feel to it in the
way that important items reveal themselves to him at the opportune
moment but it's set in the wide open great outdoors rather than a
claustrophobic house.
Justin: We were actually at
a screening last night and one of the audience commented how
terrified she was because that stuff happens in the beautiful setting
of the California daylight. There's something to that statement.
Having more traditional scares in a horror film happen during a
non-traditional time of day can be very effective.
Another thing that stood
out was the chemistry between Mike and Chris. Most films deliver a
line about how the leads are lifelong friends, then spend two hours
making you feel like they wouldn't even want to be in the same room
with one another. You manage to establish a decades long friendship
in ten minutes. How much of that is on the page versus having two
guys that can really riff off one another and changing things up as
you're shooting?
Aaron: If I can take a bit
of a third party point of view on this one for a second, Justin Peter
and Vinnie are completely brilliant and I love working with them.
Peter and Vinnie have that lived in friendship already. We saw it
when filming the beer commercial and that's why they're in this
movie. It's funny because they don't hang out in real life but on set
they have this strange antagonistic brotherhood which is so much fun
to watch and so engaging. They're completely capable improvisational
actors. However, it is extremely to important to know that Justin
wrote everything on the page. All the lines were exactly
that. We gave them the freedom to make the lines what they needed to
make them, but that usually came down to them adding in the F-word.
Justin has a naturalistic ability to write dialogue that feels very
real. During the rehearsal process, which was fairly intense, we
found some new stuff, like the “we're writing a book together about
squirrels but for the most part it was right there on the page and
out actors executed it flawlessly.
HERE MARKS THE SPOILER
TERRITORY. DON'T BE A CHUMP-RENT RESOLUTION BEFORE READING ANY
FURTHER!
The role of Chris could
have been an unsympathetic junkie that ruined his own life and on
track to ruin his friends. But by the end you have a real sympathy
for him and for what he's going through.
Justin: Yeah, there's a way
that people with substance abuse issues acts in moves and that can be
real, but there a lot of other ways that people with these issues
behave that you don't see very much and it's fun to present something
unique. We think what's a more realistic idea is there's someone who
is a drug addict because that's just the way they were born. There's
no emotional trauma he just likes doing drugs. In some ways he's
highly functioning. That seemed like a good thing to put in a scary
movie. With all the scary supernatural goings on, you also have a
scary real life issue presented as well.
That's a very cool thing
about Chris' character and it leads to one of the best exchanges in
the film when he tells Mike “Look if I had your parents, I'd be a
junkie with kick ass parents” as opposed to someone blaming
everyone else for his problem. Can you guys talk a bit about the
development of the fringe characters. You have all these weird,
offbeat characters that pop in for a moment, and kept waiting for
them to turn back up but they're completely dropped from the story.
Were you making the point hat this location was a magnet for fuckups
and off-kilter souls or were you just trying to mess with audience
expectations?
Aaron: It's all of those
things really. When Justin was writing the script it was originally
the girl in the window and maybe one other character. The problem
with it is at that moment it's a very powerful because it's
establishing the environment, but the problem is people would attach
extreme importance to it. People would read the script and think the
girl in the window would have something to do with the end of the
film. I can see why since we had a whole scene about it and then
threw it away. The theory that Justin was running with is if you
continue to add these characters then they're going to all act as red
herrings but they're also going to continue to build this environment
and a sense of unease because the audience is no longer looking at
one of them but looking at many of them. The best thing you can do
storytelling wise is have it be none of them and completely turn it
on its head. You're expecting us to give you one answer: “Oh it was
the mortgage broker or it was the Indians or it was the dog” and
it's never any of them. All of it still establishes mood and pushes
the plot forward and Mike's character continues to learn stuff and it
changes his relationship with Chris and builds on his unease. But on
top of all that great stuff it let's us set up the ending for a left
turn.
Justin: The other thing to
is those characters are all seeing our unseen antagonist in their own
way. Our UFO cult-the celestial messiah they speak of is the same big
horrifying monster that Mike and Chris are seeing at the end. This
unseen thing is becoming visible and its POV cinema where this thing
has been with them the whole time. The creepy girl at the window-what
is she staring at in the room? Anyone from the cult members, to her
and the cult members and all these people in an altered state are
experiencing the unseen antagonist in their own way.
So they're all being
manipulated in the way Mike & Chris are to its own end?
Aaron: Exactly, and that's
one of the more interesting easter eggs when you go back and watch
the movie again you can start picking out how all these people in
altered states and every single one of them has some other perception
on reality than a sober white dude like Mike.
What would have been
Mike's altered state since he's the audience surrogate and piecing it
together as he goes. He's walking the straight and narrow but seems
to know there's something there that should not be.
Justin: Michael might find
evidence of the monster, but it's the other characters that are
actually seeing it. If you look at the drawings Chris has tacked up
behind him that's what he's seeing when he's fucked up. Whereas
Michael is putting together clues and evidence while he's getting
manipulated.
Aaron: There's a couple
points where Michael thinks he sees it. There's one scene where he's
looking into a mirror and that's the closest he gets to being in
another state. It's the simplest altered state where you're looking
at a reflection and not reality. I know that seems really simple but
that's the idea. He feels something-it's not quite a drug bender-but
it's a different state. In the scene right after he takes a picture
and he feels like he can turn around and just take a picture of
what's behind him.
Justin: The other thing is
Michael is getting more and more sleep deprived as it goes on. He is
starting to get tuned in.
There are these moments
where the movie takes on a polaroid type of look where there's almost
as character passes he point of inevitability and there's no turning
back, they have to move towards the next checkpoint based on what
your antagonist has set up for the characters?
Justin: It's our monster
exerting his will on certain people at certain times and it's a hint
that what you're watching is found footage. There's hints in the
third act where Mike and Chris find a can of film footage, and as
they walk away Michael steps on the film. And as he does that you
see all these scratches as if he stepped on the film you're watching.
Aaron: And then the editor,
whoever found this material later, picked it up, scanned it into his
computer and the parts that Michael stepped on was all messed up.
It's a found footage movie that's all about finding footage as well.
As of this moment
Resolution is available through various video-on-demand outlets which
seems to be the default choice for lower budget, independent horror
movies right now. Maybe ten years ago Resolution gets buried in the
“direct-to-DVD” market along with another dozen movies competing
for shelf space at your local Blockbuster. Now there's a lot more
focus on independent horror movies because it's so readily available
to anyone that wants to see it. At the same time, I would have loved
to have watched this movie on a two hundred foot screen with a packed
crowd on opening night in a theater. As filmmakers who ultimately
want to have your work seen by as many people as possible, how do you
feel about the emergence of video on demand as a way to get a film
out as early as possible?
Aaron: We couldn't be
happier with the way the film has been handled. If it were only out
on Dvd we'd say “hey go buy it at this link for $18 and wait for it
to show up in a few days. Now I can tell anybody “hey
turn on your TV and fire up your Playstation, go to Amazon and you
can see my movie for $7. It's immediate and there's no barrier or
wait. It's really cool because more people are seeing the movie and
they're seeing it in high definition. It's a win-win for us. If
you're in Los Angeles it is playing theatrically and you can come to
a screening, meet us and we'll go for drinks afterwards. That's
awesome too, but if you're not in L.A. Everyone can see it, it's not
like you missed your chance. It's a filmmakers dream come true.
Justin:
Obviously every filmmaker would love to have their film seen in a
movie theater but a close second is to have their film seen at all.
The print and advertising costs needed to market a movie like
Resolution are prohibitively expensive. Resolution has everything you
want in a movie, but it doesn't have celebrities. VOD has opened up a
whole new market for quality cinema where you don't need a ton of
money spent advertising it. Right now there's more good genre films
than there has ever been. No bullshit there's so many good films out
there. I wonder if these new distribution channels are allowing
filmmakers to take bigger risk with their storytelling. I don't even
need to see The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 3D or Mama to know that
Citadel, American Mary and Kill List all blow those films right out
of the water.
Aaron:
Now you can make a risky film where there are no stars because you
don't have to worry about what your DVD cover looks like. Now there's
no barrier between hearing about a film that's released and seeing.
You can make risky stories and if it's well reviewed an audience will
seek it out. It doesn't matte so much that there's no stars in a
film.


A straight bonestorm of good questions.
ReplyDelete