Looking through the local papers trying to find a movie fit
for a lazy Sunday afternoon, I’m stuck between choosing a shit sandwich and
piss soup. The local AMC 10 is devoting no less than thirty percent of its
screens to Underworld: Kate Beckinsdale
Looks Awesome in Skin Tight LeatherDoesn’t She?, and my other choices are Liam Neeson Punches Out Wolves, George
Clooney In Another Movie Where He Looks Smug and some musical that stars
Cher’s corpse. Don’t get me wrong, I love Liam Neeson, but since he’s been
known to star in dreck like this
and this, he doesn’t get an
automatic pass.
Meanwhile a quick
theater locator search on both movietickets.com and fandango.com reveals that Lynne
Ramsey’s We Need To Talk About Kevin
isn’t playing within 250 miles of Boston.
I understand that Kevin is a challenging film that deals
with sensitive subject matter. Starring Tilda Swinton as the mother of a boy
who grows up to be a high school shooter, the film is based Lionel Shriver’s
novel of the same name. The book floored me. I remember plowing through the
last half of it in one sitting, finishing it off at five am despite knowing I
had a client meeting in three hours. Told through a series of reflective
letters from a wife to her husband, it’s no secret what she means by “The
Incident” she refers to throughout the novel. Yet it contains one of the
biggest gut punches of a final reveal I’ve ever come across. From what I’ve
read about the film, it stays close to the source material, and allows Swinton
to deliver a devastating performance that should have garnered Oscar
consideration. By most accounts it's the kind of horror film one could point to with pride when someone assails the genre we love as nothing but one stupid cliche after another that serves no purpose except to get women topless and power tools digging into soft flesh.
While I’m not one to put too much stock in Awards, I’d love
to at least weigh in on whether she earned a nomination. Unfortunately, despite
housing some of the most prestigious halls of higher learning in the country
and a handful of independent cinemas including Coolidge Corner, The Somerville
Theater, The Brattle Cinema, The Kendall Square Cinema, The Embassy Theater and
the West Newton Cinema, the film doesn’t warrant one screen among the nearly
thirty those theaters alone offer.
As much as other sites have bemoaned the
Video-On-Demand/limited theatrical release strategy some smaller distribution
arms have adopted, I appreciate the fact I’ve been able to legally watch and
pay for some fantastic smaller releases long before I could acquire them
through the home market. While it’s still not the route I would take, it’s shit
like this that allows me a small bit of sympathy for the asshats that steal
work through torrent sites.

AMC is useless if you want to watch any film not made by a huge studio. Like you if I wanted to go see this I'd have to drive an hour out of my way only to pay twice that of AMC. Its sad that more theaters wont show it, especially now that it's getting such acclaim.
ReplyDeleteTo be fair-AMC has done some outside the box things, like partnering with Bloody Disgusting for the Selects line of films, and offered screens to Frozen and Hatchet 2
ReplyDelete