We get some odd news and press releases in our email box every now and then. Recently we got word about the subject of this review, a triple X parody of everyone's favorite fedora wearing serial killer. On a lark I emailed the PR agent back and said if they want to send us a copy, we'll review it. A few days later lo and behold it turned up in our email box. Aside from knowing that I really, really like boobs I'm not well versed enough to review porn, I brought in good friend and resident sexologist KendrahwithanH for a guest post. You should check out her Tumblr account http://kendrahwithanh.tumblr.com/ and check out her outstanding comic strips and artwork.
If there’s one thing I like, it is good 80’s horror movies. If there is a second thing, it would be porn parodies. Apparently, director Lee Roy Myers felt similarly and thus, A Wet Dream On Elm Street was born – the tag line reads “If you don’t wake up wet, you won’t wake up at all.”
If there’s one thing I like, it is good 80’s horror movies. If there is a second thing, it would be porn parodies. Apparently, director Lee Roy Myers felt similarly and thus, A Wet Dream On Elm Street was born – the tag line reads “If you don’t wake up wet, you won’t wake up at all.”
Sadly the movie had neither effect on me. In the original
Nightmare on Elm Street, high school student Nancy Thompson is terrorized by Freddy
Krueger, who kills her boyfriend, her friends and both her parents. True 80’s
camp style leaves a lot of room for sexy scenes to be elaborated upon, since
most of them feature semi-nude teenage girls. In porn, you can’t actually have
a movie take place in high school but you still need the hot young girls. So to
recreate the feel of the original Nightmare, you do the next best thing – host
a 2-year high school reunion. A male
high school teacher, played by Chris Johnson, educates the only three attendees
(all female of course) on the legend of this bizarro-Freddy. Instead of killing
children like his 80’s inspiration, he sells drastically overpriced sex toys
out of his car trunk. The townspeople, outraged over the high prices of
trunk-dildos, decided to set him on fire. Don’t worry viewers, it’s only from
the waist up, so you can delete that mental image. Instead of sharp knives to
terrorize his victims with, his glove is fused together with 5 shiny black
vibrators.
And now Freddy is back to exact revenge on the town by
sexing their women into permanent comas filled with orgasms and sexual ecstasy.
Tell me again… where is the bad part of that?
The movie opens with a 30 minute sex scene featuring the
girl from the cover of the movie, who was actually pretty cute. You get the
idea that she and her male partner are supposed to be a teenage couple. The
entire scene goes on with no background music whatsoever, which would normally not
be an issue for me except that the sound guy decided the gagging noises needed
a little extra “boost.” The overlapping tracks of slurping and gagging would be
distracting to even the horniest of viewers, and it was a disappointing trend
for every following scene in the movie.
After all is said and done the girl wakes up from her
post-coital nap to the nudging of Freddy’s vibe-fingers. My favorite part of
this entire movie? Her first exclamation upon discovering him instead of her
boyfriend. “Oh! Edward James Olmos?! I love ALL your movies!” I had to give
this film at least the credit of making me laugh uncontrollably for a good 5
minutes. Freddy immediately ruins this by turning directly to the camera and
complaining that he never gets mistaken for a burned Brad Pitt.
The whole film has a very gonzo-like atmosphere to it,
despite the attempt at a plotline. The scenes are all overly bright, as if they
are filmed in an office with overhead fluorescents. The staged High School Reunion is so sloppily
put together that the signs might as well have been drawn in crayon with
backwards letters. This all seems to be the point though, as the actors poke
fun at the obviously ridiculous scenarios and don’t seem to take their roles
too seriously. There are even several
scenes where the actors mess up their own names, acknowledge it, and laugh it
off. This makes it hard to hate it too much.
The most memorable sex scene occurs between the male teacher
(Johnson) and one of his female students. What stands out most about this scene
is that Johnson is a one-man bukkake party. As a person who considers herself
something of a porn connoisseur I feel like nothing really fazes me anymore,
but this scene had me completely nauseous. What pours out of this man is simply
not natural, but is certainly a special skill for those who are so inclined to
watch. Keep a bucket handy, you know, for… whatever.
Attempting to ignore the parody part and trying to focus on
the sexy scenes proved to be impossible. None of the actresses are particularly
attractive enough to be especially turned on and the only thing horrifying
about this film is their acting. If you are looking for something sexy, this
movie is severely lacking. If you are looking for funny porn, there are a few
key moments in here that I’m glad to have seen, but other parodies have
certainly done better. I’d recommend just watching the original Nightmare on
Elm Street and imagining Heather Langenkamp naked.



0 comments:
Post a Comment